Just as Hollywood has repeatedly white washed the story of Jesus, they have done it again with the movie Noah.
The Truth Continues to be hidden behind closed doors.
Noah the Movie: Where Are All The Black People?
Ham the most Maligned Man in History
Although the movie Noah was not accurate according to the Bible, it was surprisingly a decent movie. In fact the movie with its special effects and unscriptural rock creatures had more drama than the story of Scripture. In the movie, Noah believed that all mankind was to be annihilated with the natural deaths of his family. Only one woman for one of his sons was saved through the flood, and she was barren. However, those familiar with the story of Noah focused on the second most powerful person in movie; Ham.
THE MOVIE NOAH REINFORCES RACIAL REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY
The 2014 film named Noah debuted starring Russell Crowe as the Ark builder. The film displays Eurocentrism’s replacement theology so subtly that astute Bible students did not comprehend the intended lesson. As expected, the family of Noah was an all white cast. Each of his three sons was especially concerned about finding a wife to take aboard the Ark. Only Japheth, however, the future father of Caucasians was allowed to bring a wife aboard the Ark. His brothers Shem and Ham, unlike the Bible’s story, did not bring wives aboard and no other women survived the Flood. Shem and Ham needed wives to continue the human race, so the movie writers had the father of the Caucasians’ wife give birth to twin girls, and these twin daughters of Japheth became the wife of Ham the father of the Black race and the wife of Shem father of the Semitic people in the fictitious movie.
The lesson communicated teaches that the father of the Caucasians is after Adam the true father of humanity since Japheth’s genes that flowed through his daughters mixed incestuously with that of his brothers Shem and Ham since they married their Caucasoid nieces according to the film. This movie’s theology, teaches three things. First, that the human race springs from the seed of the White race’s founding father, Japheth. Second, the fictitious film shows Japheth was essential in keeping the human race from extinction. Third, the film implies that ultimately black people came from Japheth through his twin daughters, when modern science has proven that whites descended from blacks. Yet, when white children ask their parents the question, “Where did black people come from?” Their parents do not reply, “Honey, the question is not where did black people came from, the answer is “We came from black people”. Scientifically it is understood that Noah and his wife could not have been Caucasian. Because Caucasians cannot, according to science, give birth to people of color and this world has people that are red, yellow, black, and brown. This brings up the question, “What color were Noah and his wife and their sons and their wives?”
THE COLOR QUESTION OF NOAH AND HIS THREE SONS
A good question is “What color were Noah and his wife, their sons, and their wives?” The answer lies in the book of Genesis. After God placed Adam and Eve in the garden, the Scripture states “they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” (Gen 2:25). In order for the nude couple to survive in equatorial Pangaea-Africa their skin contained melanin, nature’s natural sun block through skin pigmentation. Recall that the man created in God’s image was given a name reflective of his skin color. Later, God called the man’s wife by the same name as her husband. Genesis 5:2 states that God “called their name Adam” which at its root indicates red man. The first chapter in Genesis constantly affirms that everything produced after its own kind. Therefore, we conclude that before the Flood, Adam’s offspring including Noah, his three sons, and their wives bore the color of the red complexioned couple called Adam.
NOAH’S ARK STORY CAN ONLY BE VERIFIED BY HAM’S EXISTENCE
While Hollywood produces documentaries of explorers attempting to find the 5,000 year old scraps of Noah’s Ark, the Ark’s only occupant that left verifiable evidence that the Ark actually existed was Noah’s second son, Ham, father of the Negroid race. Ham was the only passenger in this legendary Ark to make a certifiable name for himself that has not been relegated to lore or legend like the Ark he helped build. This father of the Black race is given a legacy by Moses as having founded “the land of Ham”. (Ps 105:23, Heb 11:24). In Psalms 105:27 and 106:22, after Moses had finished pretending to be an African prince in this North African country, he documented ancient Egypt as “the land of Ham” where the Hebrews found themselves enslaved. There was neither a “land of Shem” nor a “land of Japheth” or Noah for that matter. The legacy Ham left was the land that bore his name, “the land of Ham”, ancient Egypt.
ATMOSPHERIC CHANGES EFFECTED HUMAN SKIN COLOR
Many pastors enjoy quoting, “as it was in the days of Noah so shall it be at the coming of the Son of Man [Jesus Christ]” (Matt 24:37). The days of Noah are chiefly known for radical climate change. The atmospheric conditions in the pre-Flood world that the red antediluvians (pre-Flood people) enjoyed differed from the climate after the Great Flood. After the Flood of Noah changed earth’s atmosphere, the changes in skin color began to be reported in Scripture with Ham naming his son Cush which means black, and his second son name is Mizraim and it means “soil red”. Hence, it is self-evident that Ham, the father of the black race carried the dominant gene for skin pigmentation. For more information of this intriguing subject order “The Complete Works of Blacks in the Bible: History’s Stolen Legacy” Vol. I-IV by James Warden. It debutes this week with 440 pages, illustrated, and contains genealogical charts only $19.99 at www.BlacksInTheBible.org.